|
Post by ponto on Mar 30, 2021 9:35:13 GMT 10
And another coalition member carries on like a clowns cock...https://www.msn.com/en-au/news/sydney/this-is-disgusting-behaviour-john-barilaro-calls-for-mp-s-resignation/ar-BB1f5Zbp?ocid=msedgdhp
|
|
|
Post by ponto on Mar 31, 2021 10:49:39 GMT 10
Oh no not another one....https://www.msn.com/en-au/news/australia/grace-tame-criticises-new-women-s-minister/ar-BB1f8rwo?ocid=msedgdhp
|
|
|
Post by Salem on Apr 7, 2021 7:22:04 GMT 10
Wow, classic victim-blaming on this thread. A woman 'asked for it' if she was drunk. How about a woman has the right to be drunk, WITHOUT being raped. Hey? How about that?! I think some people on here have joined ISIS with their Muslim-type blaming of women. No difference between the (oh a woman should not be drunk, and that Sheik's 'piece of meat' comment). And calling her crazy and relying on a (discredited and retracted) article about false memories, when she had written in her diary straight after it happened! Hardly 'false memory' when there are DIARY ENTRIES straight after - and pencil and ink on paper can be tested ie dated. Then calling her crazy. Because she had mental problems ALL DUE TO the rape.
So a woman is brutally raped.
Then develops mental issues due to the *trauma*. (duh)
Now, that very same TRAUMA and mental health issues are......used against her. There are some real low life scum and vermin on here/in the real world. To blame a woman who OF COURSE, had mental health issues BECAUSE OF THE RAPE, for her mental health issues. Circular, sick, misogynistic and evil. That she had mental health issues is pretty damn understandable why. I guess victims of Priests who suicided, became alcoholics etc are also 'nutjobs' too.
Or is that only women?
Seriously, what sort of maggot would you have to be to use the VICTIM'S very real mental health damage, due to being raped, as a weapon to beat them with? Wtf did I just read on here?
|
|
|
Post by ponto on Apr 7, 2021 8:21:01 GMT 10
Indeed that was Stellar and the conservatives...such is their thinking.....they need empathy classes.
|
|
|
Post by pim on Apr 7, 2021 9:00:41 GMT 10
|
|
|
Post by Gort on Apr 7, 2021 13:31:33 GMT 10
Wow, classic victim-blaming on this thread. A woman 'asked for it' if she was drunk. How about a woman has the right to be drunk, WITHOUT being raped. Hey? How about that?! I think some people on here have joined ISIS with their Muslim-type blaming of women. No difference between the (oh a woman should not be drunk, and that Sheik's 'piece of meat' comment). And calling her crazy and relying on a (discredited and retracted) article about false memories, when she had written in her diary straight after it happened! Hardly 'false memory' when there are DIARY ENTRIES straight after - and pencil and ink on paper can be tested ie dated. Then calling her crazy. Because she had mental problems ALL DUE TO the rape. So a woman is brutally raped. Then develops mental issues due to the *trauma*. (duh) Now, that very same TRAUMA and mental health issues are......used against her. There are some real low life scum and vermin on here/in the real world. To blame a woman who OF COURSE, had mental health issues BECAUSE OF THE RAPE, for her mental health issues. Circular, sick, misogynistic and evil. That she had mental health issues is pretty damn understandable why. I guess victims of Priests who suicided, became alcoholics etc are also 'nutjobs' too. Or is that only women? Seriously, what sort of maggot would you have to be to use the VICTIM'S very real mental health damage, due to being raped, as a weapon to beat them with? Wtf did I just read on here? G'day Salem. Just passing and spotted your contribution. Yes, it is possible that a rape could cause Bipolar disorder. It is also possible that Bipolar disorder could trigger a fictional sexual fantasy and a written account of the fantasy. As I have stated elsewhere, I don't think we will ever know which of those two possibilities is the truth in the Porter "case". Sadly, only two people knew the truth and one is now dead. If it was a rape, that could have initiated Bipolar disorder and Porter should suffer the consequences. If it wasn't a rape but was rather a sexual fantasy, it would be a textbook example of Bipolar disorder. Age of onset: tick. Nature of delusional thoughts and obsession: tick. Sadly, we will never know for sure which of those two possibilities is the true one. However, two things we do know for sure: 1. A rational discussion about the possibilities is impossible on this board. 2. Further examples of personal abuse will very likely follow in this thread. Now I must away again to the massive task of dealing with my deceased parents' estate. A very sad and lengthy process.
|
|
|
Post by ponto on Apr 7, 2021 17:45:44 GMT 10
Mr Gort.....you are relying on a theoretical basis that Porter is honest bloke.....he has proven to be criminally shonky and immoral ....as all conservatives are.
|
|
|
Post by pim on Apr 7, 2021 18:13:32 GMT 10
Should we offer congratulations to Christian Porter on his appointment as Minister for Lame Ducks?
|
|
|
Post by pim on Apr 7, 2021 18:23:50 GMT 10
Christian Porter: minister for lame ducks?Christian Porter could be a lame duck ministerwww.msn.com/en-au/news/australia/christian-porter-minister-for-lame-ducks/ar-BB1fkDU2Dogged by historic rape allegations (which he denies) and entrenched in the early stages of a defamation battle with the ABC, Porter was moved on to the portfolio of industry, science and technology last week. But he now faces another challenge: stakeholders are furious about his appointment and many don’t want to work with him. There are fears that Porter’s appointment could deter women in tech from engaging with the government. And there’s a broader feeling that the former attorney-general’s reshuffle is a sign of the government’s deep, historical ambivalence to the tech sector. Porter’s appointment has frustrated the sector in a couple of ways. Firstly, it symbolises how little thought the government gives to innovation, science and technology. Former venture capitalist and business commentator Sandy Plunkett told Crikey the appointment was unsurprising because people in the industry are long used to indifference from the government — and a string of mediocre, temporary appointments. “It’s safe to say no one is cheering this appointment,” she said. Porter will be the fifth person to hold the portfolio in the last five years. His predecessor, new Home Affairs Minister Karen Andrews, remained fairly quiet. “If you look consistently at successive governments and how they deal with tech and tech-based industries, the only conclusion you can come to is they really don’t care,” Plunkett said. And in Porter’s case, his position seems like a strategic attempt to keep the embattled minister away from the glare and the conflicts of the attorney-general’s portfolio. While Plunkett says most in the sector responded to Porter’s appointment with resigned frustration, the official reaction from major science and technology organisations was one of obligatory deference. The Australian Information Industry Association’s chief executive Ron Gauci praised the “continued prioritisation of technology”, and the Australian Computer Society diplomatically welcomed the leadership change. But beneath the surface there’s been considerable anger within those organisations, particularly from women, about their apparent support for Porter’s appointment. Some of that anger seemed to spill out into the open when the Australian Academy of Science last week apologised for a “poorly-worded tweet” welcoming Porter to his new role. “We are deeply aware of the challenging circumstances created by the reshuffle,” the Academy wrote in response to backlash on social media. But that incident is a sign of the difficulties Porter is set to face in his new role. Speaking to Crikey’s sister publication Smart Company last week, one start-up founder suggested that “an algorithm would have selected a better new minister”. Microsoft’s head of start-ups Emily Rich recently said Porter’s appointment will deter women from meeting the minister and engaging with the government. That’s not a great sign in a sector where women make up about 20% of the workforce. For a sector that, as Plunkett says, already feels like “an orphan in Australian political strategy”, the choice of a deeply controversial minister with an incentive to stay quiet could further widen the gap between the industry and government. All up, it’s a smart tactic to keep Porter out of the headlines. But it’s a pretty rough deal for Australia’s science and technology sector — especially women in the industry.
|
|
|
Post by ponto on Apr 7, 2021 20:25:44 GMT 10
Porter will have to step out of politics.
|
|