|
|
Post by caskur on Feb 28, 2013 11:18:53 GMT 10
yeah... workers are angry and rightfully so.
|
|
|
|
Post by caskur on Mar 1, 2013 8:56:08 GMT 10
oh... here comes the spin doctoring that NO ONE is going to believe except for dicks who've never had contact with reffos.
"the community" that are committing crimes were once new immigrants or reffos themselves... DOH...
what a deceiving article that is...
FAIL!
|
|
|
|
Post by caskur on Mar 1, 2013 9:10:26 GMT 10
Deceiving? The facts stand. Asylum seekers have a crime rate 45 times less than the wider community. Smacks a big hole in the xenophobes claims eh? Tell them to define "wider community", ya freaking lunatic! |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 1, 2013 9:30:11 GMT 10
All Australians left right and center would think the bum should be deported, as with any criminal claiming asylum.
Beating the drum on extreme hate as Hadley is creating simply has to stop, zealot rat bagism is not the Australian way of life.
|
|
|
|
Post by caskur on Mar 1, 2013 9:37:53 GMT 10
Listen up, dopey… no one gives a shit about the petty crimes of the wider community… no one gives a shit who gets busted for smoking a joint, knocking off a bottle of whiskey from a drive-by, jaywalking or going 10 kms over the fucking speed limit… what the community cares about is the violence and sexual violence of woman and children which those illegal immigrants commit at an alarming rate….and in my capital city, the black Africans beating up young lone men on the streets.
Stellar and I brought this subject up right before this latest event…. And now the community have been stirred up again.
How many friggen times do you and the idiot asylum seeker advocates need to be told we do NOT want single men coming here illegally and then being sheltered like prized trophies?
|
|
|
|
Post by caskur on Mar 1, 2013 9:44:21 GMT 10
I don't know anyone who has committed those crimes unless you're talking aborigines, Slaves, or blow-ins....
try harder!
|
|
|
|
Post by caskur on Mar 1, 2013 9:45:00 GMT 10
Oh yes... we know one... Montag!
|
|
|
|
Post by garfield on Mar 1, 2013 9:58:49 GMT 10
What earl is trying to say is he doesn't care how many white chicks get raped by bogus boat reffos, or how many white boys get half beaten to death by africans, the more the better, in fact he hopes gillard gets in again so she can import ten times the number of rapists and african head kickers we have now.
|
|
|
|
Post by caskur on Mar 1, 2013 10:00:09 GMT 10
Caskur, to hold your prejudiced view in the face of the facts, is, of course, your right. But you ought to acknowledge that your prejudiced view is not supported by the actual figures. you haven't given actual figures UNTIL you individually name the convicted criminals.....let's all see their surnames... |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 1, 2013 10:01:11 GMT 10
Okay Juliar, what are you gonna do with your illegal wanna be refs now?? As I said before, it is ILLEGAL to live in commercial premises. Remember, these guys are country shoppers. They've got "problems" back home. FFS, everyone has problems. But problems per se is not enough to warrant refugee status!! They have to be coming from a war zone or are facing persecution. That is NOT happening in Sri Lanka now. Time to send these freeloaders BACK!! Home sweet home for refugees is the filthy floor of an illegal flophouse Elias Jashan and Rosemarie Lentini The Daily Telegraph March 01, 2013 12:00AM  A GROUP of asylum seekers is being housed in a commercial building in the centre of Parramatta, in Sydney's west.A GROUP of boat people crammed into a commercial building in the centre of Parramatta has been kicked out after a raid by the council. Dozens of Sri Lankans were sleeping on the floor of converted offices in a single-storey house that formerly was home to a drafting and engineering business. Parramatta lord mayor John Chedid said last night he ordered the raid late yesterday because council had not approved residential use of the commercial building. "Parramatta City Council has not approved a boarding house on this property, and it has not received any complaints or reports about it being used as a boarding house previously," he said. "Following this morning's media coverage, council took action to look into the matter and organised a team to undertake an inspection of the property this afternoon." Among the men living in the office was Daxchan Selvarajah, 21, who has been charged with breaking into a female student's room at Macquarie University and putting his hands down the young woman's pyjama pants while she was sleeping. Selvarajah listed the property as his home after he was arrested for the alleged sex attack. He is in custody and will apply for bail next month. The Sri Lankans at the property yesterday told the Parramatta Advertiser they had been moved to the commercial building in the past week from detention centres in Curtin and Weipa. The group said they received $438 a fortnight from the federal government and pay $400 a week in rent to a church group. The men claimed they slept two to a room on either sheets on the floor or dirty mattresses. When The Daily Telegraph visited the house before the raid yesterday, the property was in a poor state. The home has no fridge and only one toilet and shower. One refugee said the number of men in the property varied but there was usually 10 or 12 at one time. Yesterday, there were 26 pairs of shoes on the front porch. All the men said they were on bridging visas and are Tamils seeking refugee status. One said he was happy with the accommodation, despite it not being fit for residential use. "We are happy here, it is better than the detention centres," he said. "No one is the leader here. We are the same. We want to work, but we don't have work rights." He said they had previously been in emergency accommodation in Toongabbie after being transferred from the camps. There were no children or women with them. Each had paid up to $10,000 for passage to Australia. "We are Tamil people and we have many problems back home," the man said. As we have said, the problems they are whinging about are caused by their own attitudes. They are Hindus and they have the attitude that as Hindus they are born to rule according to their caste system. They are a minority in Sri Lanka and minorities must learn that that doesn't give them majority rule status. It is NOT a reason to apply for refugee status in Australia! - See more at: www.dailytelegraph.com.au/news/home-sweet-home-for-refugees-is-the-filthy-floor-of-an-illegal-flophouse/story-e6freuy9-1226588001252#sthash.J3ofnQPH.dpuf |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 1, 2013 10:03:48 GMT 10
Caskur, to hold your prejudiced view in the face of the facts, is, of course, your right. But you ought to acknowledge that your prejudiced view is not supported by the actual figures. My son tells me that ethnicity/religion is recorded by police when they charge people but that they do NOT make those statistics public. |
|
|
|
Post by caskur on Mar 1, 2013 10:07:39 GMT 10
Caskur, to hold your prejudiced view in the face of the facts, is, of course, your right. But you ought to acknowledge that your prejudiced view is not supported by the actual figures. My son tells me that ethnicity/religion is recorded by police when they charge people but that they do NOT make those statistics public. exactly and the only way to get reports are from news articles when they publish them and that is how I've based my concerns over the last decade!.... they mostly have foreign and non UK origin names. |
|
|
|
Post by pim on Mar 1, 2013 10:55:49 GMT 10
Reading through this thread, the inescapable conclusion is that you've stumbled upon the old racist central. Here are some facts: Sri Lanka is not a peaceful place. Particularly if you're Tamil. It's becoming a one-party dictatorship and the relationship that the Australian Government is building with this regime with the intent of stemming the flow of refugees is a case of supping with the devil. It's also a race to the bottom that Labor is engaged in with the Liberals. It's the type of contest that the Liberals will always win. Australia is playing a dangerous game with Sri Lankawww.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2013/feb/21/australia-playing-dangerous-game-sri-lankaIt's election year in Australia, and that means open season on boat migrants. Last year, 17,000 people arrived by boat, with a massive surge of 6,500 from Sri Lanka. These numbers have an alarming impact on Australia's human rights record as the government puts in place draconian domestic measures to deal with the increase, and plays a foolhardy game of building military and security links with Sri Lanka to stem the flow. Harsh measures for dealing with people arriving by boat are nothing new in Australia. The Howard government set the tone in 2001 by mobilising special forces to seize the Norwegian freighter MV Tampa after it rescued more than 400 refugees from a sinking vessel and brought them into Australian waters. The "Pacific solution" was then introduced, whereby outer islands were excised from the Australian territory for the purpose of migration and judicial review. Refugee claimants arriving by boat at excised territories were mandatorily detained and transported to harsh offshore camps administered by Australia in countries such as Nauru – a practice stopped in 2008, but reactivated last August. The Australian government is now constructing permanent facilities in Nauru to detain boat migrants, and also runs a detention camp in Manus Island, Papua New Guinea. The PNG opposition were in court last week, challenging the legality of the Manus Island detention centre. The migration amendment (unauthorised maritime arrivals) bill 2012 now seeks to implement the Pacific solution throughout Australia. What was an exception is to become the norm. A new category of "unauthorised maritime arrivals" will discriminate against people on the basis of the mode of their journey to Australia. If you arrive by boat, you face mandatory detention in a harsh and remote place. Travel by plane and you will be able to apply for a protection visa on arrival. Given most maritime arrivals are from Afghanistan, Iran, Iraq and Sri Lanka, the legal regime effectively implements a de facto form of apartheid based on country of origin (and here, let us note that article 3 of the 1951 refugee convention obliges Australia to fulfil its protection obligations without discriminating on the basis of "race, religion, or country of origin"). As such, the migration amendment bill seeks to implement a staggering legal artifice for a nation that claims to walk tall among the civilised. The Australian government has also introduced the dangerous practice of forced repatriations of people it claims are not refugees (last September, Human Rights Watch documented the torture of Tamil men and women repatriated to Sri Lanka by the UK Border Agency). These people are returned within 72 hours of arrival, and with "screening" taking place offshore, this happens without any provision of legal assistance for the returnees, or transparency in relation to the work of immigration officials. The risk of refoulement – the return of refugees with a right to protection to their persecutors – is increased, thus flouting the fundamental obligation under the refugee convention. Australia's extreme measures have been prompted by a curious surge in the number of people arriving by boat from Sri Lanka. In 2012 around 6,500 people made this arduous journey. In the previous year the number of Sri Lankan arrivals was a mere 211. Department of Immigration statistics indicate that 5,215 of the 2012 arrivals were Tamil, and 1,027 Sinhalese. In the last month, the number arriving has dramatically reduced to a trickle. What explains these fluctuations, and what is to be made of the Australian reaction to it? Earlier this month, the Australian reported that Australia's intelligence agencies suspected an official with a high profile close to President Mahinda Rajapaksa was "responsible for authorising numerous boats in the past 10 months, fuelling the surge of asylum seekers from Sri Lanka". The Sri Lankan government has denied the allegations. The suggestion is that Sri Lanka can "turn on the tap" and "unleash untold asylum boats". Australia has chosen an unreliable security and surveillance partner. The politics of people smuggling is hardly ever only about the people being trafficked and those exploiting their desperation. Because of its hysterical attitude to those seeking asylum, Australia has potentially walked into the trap of being held hostage by any authoritarian regime that colludes in people smuggling. The currency they will demand is a blind-eye to human rights violations, favourable diplomatic attention and security partnerships. The Australian minister for foreign affairs, Bob Carr, visited Sri Lanka in December and announced training for Sri Lankan naval officers on surveillance and intelligence gathering. The shadow minister for foreign affairs, Julie Bishop, visited Sri Lanka last month and praised its postwar reconciliation and reconstruction efforts. It's one thing for Australia to throw the refugee convention out the window, and another to weigh in on issues such as reconciliation and militarisation in another country. If they want to do the former they should do it honestly; the latter is gratuitous, unnecessary and harmful. As Australians look ahead to the renewal they deserve in an election year, is it not time to imagine a different, better Australia? Let's not add another episode of "unutterable shame" to Australia's archive of atrocity. Instead, let Australia summon up the sentiments of Henry Lawson's iconic 1891 poem, Freedom on the Wallaby, for today it is not the rebel's blood but a callous disregard for the vulnerable that "stains the wattle". |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 1, 2013 11:17:11 GMT 10
Oh for gawd's sake!! What are you saying?? That we should accept every single Tamil that comes here? Majority rules. If they don't like it they can go back to India where Hindus rule supreme. But not here!!
|
|
|
|
Post by caskur on Mar 1, 2013 11:22:03 GMT 10
Reading through this thread, the inescapable conclusion is that you've stumbled upon the old racist central. To be racist is to think your race is better than other racists. Check. Here are some facts: Sri Lanka is not a peaceful place. Particularly if you're Tamil. Not Australia’s problem. Why do you think Australia’s main inhabitants need to burden themselves with other people’s self made problems when they’re straining under the crippling financial problems they already have? Do you ever think of them… EVER? |
|
|
|
Post by caskur on Mar 1, 2013 11:27:44 GMT 10
Oh for gawd's sake!! What are you saying?? That we should accept every single Tamil that comes here? Majority rules. If they don't like it they can go back to India where Hindus rule supreme. But not here!! There is a massive affordable housing shortage where I live... like worst than chronic. I've heard them claim new immigrants should be sent to the bush.... the housing in our state in the bush is not only completely non existent, but whatever is available, is 2000 a week in rent and I am talking about the mining towns where they claim that is where the employment is. I'd do a real estate thread here but pictures fail... |
|
|
|
Post by caskur on Mar 1, 2013 11:44:19 GMT 10
Oh for gawd's sake!! What are you saying?? That we should accept every single Tamil that comes here? Majority rules. If they don't like it they can go back to India where Hindus rule supreme. But not here!! Benito would be so proud! Fascism (pron.: /ˈfæʃɪzəm/) is a form of radical authoritarian nationalism that came to prominence in mid-20th century Europe. Fascists seek to unify their nation through a totalitarian state that seeks the mass mobilization of the national community, relying on a vanguard party to initiate a revolution to organize the nation on fascist principles. Hostile to liberal democracy, socialism, and communism, fascist movements share certain common features, including the veneration of the state, a devotion to a strong leader, and an emphasis on ultranationalism, ethnocentrism, and militarism. Fascism views political violence, war, and imperialism as a means to achieve national rejuvenation and asserts that "superior" nations and races should attain living space by displacing weak and inferior ones. SHE'S ALREADY STATED OVER AND OVER that like the rest of us, she doesn't have a problem with migration, fool... this isn't immigration.. it's country shopping. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 1, 2013 11:53:03 GMT 10
Exactly!! And talking of fascism, that certainly sounds like the Hindu born to rule attitude in India. Caste systems that keep people in their place - and especially those at the bottom who do not even have a caste and who are only fit to remove faeces and dead bodies and rubbish from the streets - the untouchables.
Now what do you make of that system, Earl Grey??
|
|
|
|
Post by caskur on Mar 1, 2013 11:57:35 GMT 10
Exactly!! And talking of fascism, that certainly sounds like the Hindu born to rule attitude in India. Caste systems that keep people in their place - and especially those at the bottom who do not even have a caste and who are only fit to remove faeces and dead bodies and rubbish from the streets - the untouchables. Now what do you make of that system, Earl Grey?? system, like fascism, sucks. Indians treat Australian like sewer rats. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 1, 2013 11:58:03 GMT 10
Right! And that's where all those born to rule Hindus belong!
But not here.
|
|
|
|
Post by bender on Mar 1, 2013 14:20:04 GMT 10
Stellar doesnt have a problem with migration?
That's like saying that the Arab's don't have an problem with the Jews.
Stellar doesn't have a problem with people from other countries migrating here.
As long as they not fleeing opression somewhere else. As long as you don't come from a country with a "stan" tacked onto its name, as long as you don't come from Africa (or rather as long as you're not black), as long as you don't come from India, as long as you're not Hindu (smart move covering both Stellar, India has more then 200 million people who aren't Hindu. As long as you're not a Pacific Islander, Asian or Indonesian.
And as long as you speak English to her standards.
And it would really help if you were, well to put it bluntly, white. That's the equivilent of a gold star on your application as far as Stellar is concerned.
The term xenophobe does come to mind.
|
|
|
|
Post by caskur on Mar 1, 2013 14:21:42 GMT 10
we'd like to be free of your oppression..
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 1, 2013 16:22:59 GMT 10
Stellar doesnt have a problem with migration? That's like saying that the Arab's don't have an problem with the Jews. Stellar doesn't have a problem with people from other countries migrating here. As long as they not fleeing opression somewhere else. As long as you don't come from a country with a "stan" tacked onto its name, as long as you don't come from Africa (or rather as long as you're not black), as long as you don't come from India, as long as you're not Hindu (smart move covering both Stellar, India has more then 200 million people who aren't Hindu. As long as you're not a Pacific Islander, Asian or Indonesian. And as long as you speak English to her standards. And it would really help if you were, well to put it bluntly, white. That's the equivilent of a gold star on your application as far as Stellar is concerned. The term xenophobe does come to mind. How very droll and amusing you are today Bender. ;D |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 1, 2013 16:23:28 GMT 10
we'd like to be free of your oppression.. Lol. |
|
|
|
Post by garfield on Mar 1, 2013 16:34:40 GMT 10
The trouble with self loathing leftys is even a muslim reffo rapist is still preferable to a law abiding white conservative, just ask one they'll tell you, they tell me every day, on this board and others, the theme is always the same, they don't care how many school girls are gang raped by Pakistani immigrants or how many terror plots are uncovered, the white guy that voted for John Howard is the one you have to look out for.
Who can forget when woman abusing arsehole David Hicks, the guy that was fighting for a world where your daughter can be raped and murdered with the full support of the state for showing an ankle came to town and the left were lining up en masse to suck his dick ... lefties they are a weird mob, not people you'd want your children around thats for sure.
|
|
