Post by pim on Jan 8, 2013 11:37:36 GMT 10
Meet Mr Kilogram - or rather Monsieur Kilogramme, or rather the IPK or "International Prototype Kilogram", which I think is the most boring name imaginable for it that only a late 20th century bureaucrat could have come up with. I prefer "Monsieur Kilogramme". 
And what would Socrates have made of the kilogram? The Guardian newspaper obligingly imagines a Socratic dialogue about the kilogram - after all, "kilogram" is two Greek words. www.guardian.co.uk/science/shortcuts/2013/jan/07/how-much-does-kilogram-weigh
Age: 217 (years).
Appearance: It's not about what it looks like; it's about what it weighs.
And how much does it weigh? It weighs a kilogram.
And how much is that? A thousand grams.
And how much does a gram weigh? Originally, exactly as much as "a volume of water equal to the cube of the hundredth part of the metre, at the temperature of melting ice".
I don't find that terribly helpful. Not many did. That's why, in 1889, the mass of the kilogram was redefined as being equal to the IPK.
Which is what, pray tell? The International Prototype Kilogram – a 39 millimetre-high, platinum-iridium alloy cylinder, stored in a vault at the International Bureau of Weights and Measures in Sèvres, France.
And it weighs a kilogram? It doesn't just weigh a kilogram; it is the kilogram – the standard against which all other kilogram weights are measured.
Sounds like a pretty straightforward system. There's only one problem – the kilogram is getting heavier.
Pardon? It is estimated that a build up of pollutants may have added tens of micrograms to the IPK over the years.
What are they measuring it against? A bag of rice? There are 40 official IPK replicas around the world, and they all appear to be gaining weight at different rates. The divergence, even at such small levels, could be a problem.
Is there a solution? Researchers at the University of Newcastle (UK) have tried exposing similar surfaces to UV radiation, removing carbonaceous contamination and theoretically returning the metal to its original weight.
Who cares? Whatever the IPK weighs, it's the kilogram. But so many other units of measurement depend on it. If the kilogram changes, so must the newton; if the newton changes, so must the joule. That's why there are plans to define the kilogram not by a prototype, but in terms of fundamental physical constants.
Do say: "Please can I have some apples equivalent to 84,446,8893 × 83⅓ atoms of carbon-12, give or take?"
Don't say: "What's that in pounds, mate? Don't make me do the maths."
And what would Socrates have made of the kilogram? The Guardian newspaper obligingly imagines a Socratic dialogue about the kilogram - after all, "kilogram" is two Greek words. www.guardian.co.uk/science/shortcuts/2013/jan/07/how-much-does-kilogram-weigh
Age: 217 (years).
Appearance: It's not about what it looks like; it's about what it weighs.
And how much does it weigh? It weighs a kilogram.
And how much is that? A thousand grams.
And how much does a gram weigh? Originally, exactly as much as "a volume of water equal to the cube of the hundredth part of the metre, at the temperature of melting ice".
I don't find that terribly helpful. Not many did. That's why, in 1889, the mass of the kilogram was redefined as being equal to the IPK.
Which is what, pray tell? The International Prototype Kilogram – a 39 millimetre-high, platinum-iridium alloy cylinder, stored in a vault at the International Bureau of Weights and Measures in Sèvres, France.
And it weighs a kilogram? It doesn't just weigh a kilogram; it is the kilogram – the standard against which all other kilogram weights are measured.
Sounds like a pretty straightforward system. There's only one problem – the kilogram is getting heavier.
Pardon? It is estimated that a build up of pollutants may have added tens of micrograms to the IPK over the years.
What are they measuring it against? A bag of rice? There are 40 official IPK replicas around the world, and they all appear to be gaining weight at different rates. The divergence, even at such small levels, could be a problem.
Is there a solution? Researchers at the University of Newcastle (UK) have tried exposing similar surfaces to UV radiation, removing carbonaceous contamination and theoretically returning the metal to its original weight.
Who cares? Whatever the IPK weighs, it's the kilogram. But so many other units of measurement depend on it. If the kilogram changes, so must the newton; if the newton changes, so must the joule. That's why there are plans to define the kilogram not by a prototype, but in terms of fundamental physical constants.
Do say: "Please can I have some apples equivalent to 84,446,8893 × 83⅓ atoms of carbon-12, give or take?"
Don't say: "What's that in pounds, mate? Don't make me do the maths."
