|
|
Post by Occam's Spork on Feb 11, 2013 4:52:25 GMT 10
Yes, I know...you've tried this lie before. But the name of this 'eminent psychiatrist' is conveniently withheld for legal reasons, right? Either that, or he doesn't exist. If he does exist, he isn't that bright because he broke the most basic code of the profession. 1. If he does exist, you are under legal obligation to tell me his name, if he is going to diagnose me as a patient. 2. And if he does exist, I will sue his arse for breaking patient/doctor confidentiality. But you and I both know you are lying your arse off.I'll allow you to save some face, by admitting it now. No he exists. He is an eminent doctor in his field. And his opinion is right - exactly right. He has not broken any code. He knows what he is talking about. 1 he exists and I am not under any obligation to divulge the name of a friend. His comment that religiosity is a sign of mental illness is a general one and it goes without saying that you have a high degree of religiosity and it is plain that you are mentally ill. 2 He exists and you can threaten what you like - he does not know your name or where you exist and you are not his patient. He can say quite clearly from the stuff you post you are mentally ill. I am telling the truth - but you have a problem with reality. You will allow? Who are you to allow anything? Did I mention you are delusional? I have no doubt that you are seeing a psychiatrist. --That is not in dispute. The rest of it, you made up yourself. Without a name, your testimony has no credibility. Conjuring up a fictional psychiatrist friend does nothing except offer you a cowardly method to be dismissive without ever having to account for your claims. If he is such a great friend, I want a name and credentials. Otherwise, his opinions are as valued as yours. (P.S. Incidentally Buzz, if your nameless made-up psychiatrist friend keeps making unauthorized medical diagnosis', (*Yes, I know my rights.*) that doesn't mean I'm crazy.) |
|
|
|
Post by Occam's Spork on Feb 16, 2013 1:50:04 GMT 10
I have no doubt that you are seeing a psychiatrist. --That is not in dispute. The rest of it, you made up yourself. Without a name, your testimony has no credibility. Conjuring up a fictional psychiatrist friend does nothing except offer you a cowardly method to be dismissive without ever having to account for your claims. If he is such a great friend, I want a name and credentials. Otherwise, his opinions are as valued as yours. (P.S. Incidentally Buzz, if your nameless made-up psychiatrist friend keeps making unauthorized medical diagnosis', (*Yes, I know my rights.*) that doesn't mean I'm crazy.) Yes I have a very bad case of PTSD - and the treatment included counseling. I'm not so certain that covers it. Then if your 'friend' is going to make casual comments about me. Then he is are obligated BY LAW to disclose his identity. Yeah, yeah... Hitler blamed the Jews for his lot too. I don't expect you'd want to follow HIS example. Well I doubt he said that as a professional, because that'd be an unethical use of his credentials, and he'd likely be drummed out of his profession. So you are either lying, or he's a quack. I'm fine with either conclusion. |
|
|
|
Post by Occam's Spork on Feb 17, 2013 3:33:49 GMT 10
Well until you disclose a name, his opinion is as valid as yours.
|
|
|
|
Post by Occam's Spork on Feb 17, 2013 3:55:20 GMT 10
Here we read: Yes he said it and he meant it and its widely known and understood and you demonstrate it all the time. We were having a conversation about religion and religious people and I was speaking of one individual in particular - not you - and he said plainly that religiosity is indicative of mental illness. But before, you said: [quote author=buzzock board=religion thread=895 post=18752 time=1360464874 ]He can say quite clearly from the stuff you post you are mentally ill. [/quote]  Did he say it, or YOU? If he is going to diagnose and slander me in such a way, I want a name. Either, concede the deception or give me a name. I know my rights. |
|
|
|
Post by Occam's Spork on Feb 18, 2013 22:50:16 GMT 10
Well until you disclose a name, his opinion is as valid as yours. Boy it really has you bothered. Perhaps I should tell you his name so you can make an international fool of yourself. I'm not the one who is making pronouncements and trying to forward them with false credentials. As for being bothered, you seem really agitated that we don't buy into your zoroastrian bullshit. |
|
|
|
Post by Occam's Spork on Feb 18, 2013 23:06:44 GMT 10
You have exorcised someone possessed of a demon. Well that is Schizophrenia right there. You are delusional and reality such as Judaism coming from Zoroastrianism just does not have any effect on you. It is the nature of Delusion that overwhelming evidence does not shift it. Well that reasoning is circular because your incredulity results from your a priori rejection of the supernatural. I could say that you are Schizophrenic from your UFO experience, and your bomb shelter project. Then if he were really professional, he would have said nothing. It's illegal in his profession to make comments about religion and/or sexual orientation. I'm a layman, and even I know that. You are lying, Buzz. So you are making outlandish pronouncements, and ascribing them to his credentials. I'm sure he'd appreciate that. You think every christian thinks they're Jesus? No. What you've said is opinion. And until he is present for questioning, I'd advise you to keep reference to him at a minimum. |
|
|
|
Post by Occam's Spork on Feb 19, 2013 3:50:54 GMT 10
I wasn't alone when I saw something odd in the sky - others saw it as well I know nothing of any bomb shelter. It is not against the law in Australia for a doctor to speak generally I am telling the truth - he said religiosity is indicative of mental illness and I believe that. You are clearly delusional. I can say what I like - do your worst. The apostles weren't alone when they saw the risen Christ... Next? |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 19, 2013 7:53:33 GMT 10
Of course evolution is a fact, even the bible tells us evolution happened. There was no 'grand' or 'intelligent' design, WE EVOLVED. Only a mentally challenged twit would believe otherwise.
Get over it
|
|
