Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 13, 2012 18:45:14 GMT 10
Food for thought -
|
|
|
|
Post by jody on Dec 13, 2012 22:22:57 GMT 10
God exists Skippy, we know that as do many, many millions.
|
|
|
|
Post by fat on Dec 13, 2012 23:06:49 GMT 10
For you Buzz they exist too OK.
|
|
|
|
Post by fat on Dec 14, 2012 1:46:28 GMT 10
Looks more like Magnum  |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 14, 2012 14:54:03 GMT 10
Buzzo,
Mate , you seem to dwell and relish in fringe scholarship.
No mainstream scholars agree with your YHWH and his wife theories.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 14, 2012 14:56:14 GMT 10
Earl
#5 was that the foolishness of people who believe in that they were created by a lightning strike in pondscum and a couple of billion years of random radiational/genetic advantageous mutations so that they became self replicating DNA machines with no ultimate purpose in a Universe that doesn't care?
|
|
|
|
Post by Occam's Spork on Dec 14, 2012 15:37:57 GMT 10
Nice quote. Works as much for the atheist, as it does for the theist. It really gets the debate nowhere, though. |
|
|
|
Post by Occam's Spork on Dec 14, 2012 15:40:13 GMT 10
Buzzo, Mate , you seem to dwell and relish in fringe scholarship. No mainstream scholars agree with your YHWH and his wife theories. Truth. Which is what I spent the last 10 pages or so, trying to tell him. |
|
|
|
Post by Occam's Spork on Dec 14, 2012 22:03:11 GMT 10
Yes, I am certain there is some rather dubious and odious stuff trying to pass itself off as scientific literature.
But references from Wikipedia and pseudo archaeology do not constitute as 'mainstream research'.
Mainstream science is scientific inquiry in an established field of study that does not depart significantly from orthodox theories. If it's not a widely known or accepted theory, it's fringe pseudo science. Often for good reason.
IMO, if Google, and not the library, is your main source of research, it's not to be considered mainstream science.
I will be completely candid with you: Until your theory is widely accepted, you are reduced to nothing more than a 'whack-a-do' conspiracy theorist.
You might as well be talking about crop circles, UFO's and the 2012 Mayan Calendar.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 15, 2012 14:14:12 GMT 10
If you consider Mark Twain accurate then do you consider his view that 'Palestine' was largely uninhabited in the late 19th century and there was no nation consisting of 'Palestinians.' |
|
|
|
Post by slartibartfast on Dec 15, 2012 15:42:54 GMT 10
If you consider Mark Twain accurate then do you consider his view that 'Palestine' was largely uninhabited in the late 19th century and there was no nation consisting of 'Palestinians.' Do you consider that view accurate, skippy? |
|
|
|
Post by slartibartfast on Dec 15, 2012 16:28:41 GMT 10
I prefer them in oil.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 16, 2012 23:14:39 GMT 10
Good to see the atheists putting up such a poor showing on the actual video response.
No comments about any of the points made. Typical.
|
|
|
|
Post by matt on Dec 17, 2012 0:14:00 GMT 10
God created both Good and Evil, and it is not for me to question this. It is part of the perfect plan, and I must simply accept all creation of God.
|
|
|
|
Post by Occam's Spork on Dec 17, 2012 9:38:36 GMT 10
Sub Manly, Here the reality is staring you point blank in the face and you refuce to see it. This is called overwhelming evidence contrary to your beliefs - actual archaeological findings at Ugarit and beautiful personillet Ajrud. And I assure you it is the accepted theory. It is known now that the Jews/Israelites were polytheistic until the 2nd Century BCE after the adopted Zoroastrian ideas. It is widely known and accepted as the case. Stavrakopoulou bases her theory on ancient texts, amulets and figurines unearthed primarily in the ancient Canaanite coastal city called Ugarit, now modern-day Syria. All of these artifacts reveal that Asherah was a powerful fertility goddess. Asherah's connection to Yahweh, according to Stavrakopoulou, is spelled out in both the Bible and an 8th century B.C. inscription on pottery found in the Sinai desert at a site called beautiful personillet Ajrud. "The inscription is a petition for a blessing," she shares. "Crucially, the inscription asks for a blessing from 'Yahweh and his Asherah.' Here was evidence that presented Yahweh and Asherah as a divine pair. And now a handful of similar inscriptions have since been found, all of which help to strengthen the case that the God of the Bible once had a wife." news.discovery.com/history/god-wife-yahweh-asherah-110318.htmlChances are, something has recently occured to change her opinion, Buzz. Francesca stavrakopoulou has converted. She's on OUR side, now. Do your research! luisjovel.blogspot.ca/2012/06/francesca-stavrakopoulou-from-atheist.html |
|
