|
Post by pim on Nov 8, 2012 16:16:48 GMT 10
"Inside Job" - will it try his patience??
|
|
|
Post by spindrift on Nov 8, 2012 17:11:04 GMT 10
No matter how it is spun, it was in the deregulated market Bush created that created the GFC.
It would be madness if Mitt the Twit had won the US election and implimented his backward policies, such as drilling for more oil, influenza may kill people, certianly climate change will definetly kill peolpe.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 8, 2012 17:29:48 GMT 10
Exactly it was Clinton who brought the GFC.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 8, 2012 17:35:33 GMT 10
Exactly it was Clinton who brought the GFC. And it was that idiot Bush (the 2nd) who threw away hundreds of billions of dollars on warmongering because his god told him to.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 8, 2012 17:45:08 GMT 10
It still doesn't change the fact that Dubya went to war in Iraq because his god told him to.
The idiot admitted as such.
The result was a few hundred billion dollars being chucked away on warmongering because of a delusion inside Dubya's head.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 8, 2012 17:48:30 GMT 10
If you're thick enough to believe that Kiwi then who are we to try to educate you out of your error.
|
|
|
Post by spindrift on Nov 8, 2012 17:52:52 GMT 10
No doubt there exist corrupt economist, it is the President that determines bullshit from fact.
Bush took the bullshit and ran with it....he was most likely warned of the consequence of a totally unregulated market, as any good economist would know, Presidents should take all things into account and make an independent and intelligent decisions...Bush was a gullible numb nut.
Clinton deregulated with constraints...Bush further deregulated without constraint.
The economic fundamental difference.
|
|