|
|
Post by matt on Oct 24, 2012 20:06:37 GMT 10
|
|
|
|
Post by garfield on Oct 24, 2012 20:09:32 GMT 10
|
|
|
|
Post by matt on Oct 24, 2012 20:09:58 GMT 10
It is not irrefutable. I refute it right here, right now. You cannot deny the evidence that the Spirit healed him! |
|
|
|
Post by garfield on Oct 24, 2012 20:11:31 GMT 10
|
|
|
|
Post by garfield on Oct 24, 2012 20:14:37 GMT 10
|
|
|
|
Post by pim on Oct 25, 2012 6:43:55 GMT 10
Historians also say that taking all the "evidence" into account Jesus could only have been born in the year 4 BC. So he was born four years before the "while shepherds watched their flocks by night" thing. Go figure ...  Doesn't stop me from enjoying traditional Chrissie carols though ...  |
|
|
|
Post by Occam's Spork on Nov 4, 2012 10:25:28 GMT 10
Straw man Fallacy
No one claimed Jesus was born December 25, Buzz.
She can hardly be said to be a virgin, then..
Rape victim, possibly.
|
|
|
|
Post by slartibartfast on Nov 4, 2012 11:31:19 GMT 10
And you believe this "immaculate" conception theory?
|
|
