|
|
Post by chequeredflaggg on Oct 21, 2012 9:34:30 GMT 10
pretty obvious why that knob Brown took the last parachute and jumped, isnt it?
people realise that Greens are the Labor Partys padded cell block, and that Greens are responsible for ramming lunatic minority-fringe waste of money policies like Carbon tax down peoples throats.
People also realise that Hanson young schoolie bint is a stalinist leftard asylum-seeker enabler.
|
|
|
|
Post by chequeredflaggg on Oct 21, 2012 9:49:55 GMT 10
and I mean jesus, the ACT...theyre all fertile Greens soil anyway...bludging overpaid public servants inner-suburban types who dont have real jobs...
if they start peeling off the Greens..theres an issue.
|
|
|
|
Post by spindrift on Oct 21, 2012 10:10:51 GMT 10
A Liberal - Green alliance...what a novel idea..
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 21, 2012 11:34:25 GMT 10
Jeeeeeezus this thread has a rather nasty, violent title. I guess this means the author of the post which established this thread has nasty, violent tendencies, eh?  |
|
|
|
Post by matt on Oct 21, 2012 21:05:19 GMT 10
The Greens have been taken over by the watermelons and are no longer Bob Browns party.
People don't want watermelons, so the Greens are finished!
|
|
|
|
Post by chequeredflaggg on Oct 22, 2012 6:38:01 GMT 10
Brown was a watermelon himself...and a real petulent tool who was virtually un-interviewable..could not even be asked questions about actual Greens policies, without melting down and taking his hat anc coat off..was a weirdo and not in a good way.
just not a stupid fucking schoolie and uni "Stalinist club" lesbian, like the current crop, such as 'Sarah".
|
|
|
|
Post by pim on Oct 22, 2012 8:52:58 GMT 10
The Greens have been taken over by the watermelons and are no longer Bob Browns party. People don't want watermelons, so the Greens are finished! You're kinda right, Matt - kinda! Adjust your sights just a little. The point is that the Greens stand exposed as the Bob Brown Party, and now that Bob Brown has gone so has their raison d'être. The Colonel has a point too about the ACT being fertile Greens territory. Although Colonel in defence of the ACT I have to point out that something like 25% of the ACT workforce is in some sort of defence-related occupation. There's also a lot of people there in the building industry and in retail. Taken with Queanbeyan the Canberra region is a major urban area of something like 400 000 people. Canberra Hospital is the biggest health facility outside Sydney and services an area in southern NSW that's a lot more than just the ACT. But back to the Greens and the ACT. Canberra has always recorded a high vote for the Greens just as it used to for the Democrats. And that's the point isn't it. Once Don Chipp was out of the loop the Democrats were seen as the Don Chipp party that had lost its mojo. Same with the Greens and Bob Brown. What we saw over the weekend in the ACT is that the electorate is polarising towards the two major parties at the expense of the Greens and the other minority fruitcakes. Interesting point, though: there was a swing to Labor of 1.7% (last night's figures). There was a swing to the Libs of 6.5% or thereabouts. There was a swing away from the Greens of 4.6%. Assuming (and it ain't necessarily so) that the 1.7% swing to Labor was made up of ex-Green voters, where did the other 3% anti Green swing go? Go figure!! Does that mean that everyone who in the past has voted Green is not necessarily an ex-Labor voter?? Just asking!! One thingis for sure, I'd rate Adam Bandt's chances in Melbourne as akin to those of a snowflake in hell ... unless of course the Abbott Liberals preference him again!!  |
|
|
|
Post by spindrift on Oct 22, 2012 9:02:34 GMT 10
Bob Brown or not people are seeing the Greens as spoilers, much like the conservatives under Abbotts and he will have to change his spots if the people want to take his party seriously.
|
|
|
|
Post by slartibartfast on Oct 22, 2012 14:16:42 GMT 10
Jeeeeeezus this thread has a rather nasty, violent title. I guess this means the author of the post which established this thread has nasty, violent tendencies, eh? No kidding, Sherlock!  |
|
|
|
Post by Salem on Oct 22, 2012 18:24:02 GMT 10
Jeeeeeezus this thread has a rather nasty, violent title. I guess this means the author of the post which established this thread has nasty, violent tendencies, eh? I'll remember that next time someone uses the term 'smashed' in relation to getting pissed/drunk. You seriously have to be desperately reaching to come up with that KTJ. |
|
|
|
Post by chequeredflaggg on Oct 23, 2012 13:55:27 GMT 10
The Greens have been taken over by the watermelons and are no longer Bob Browns party. People don't want watermelons, so the Greens are finished! You're kinda right, Matt - kinda! Adjust your sights just a little. The point is that the Greens stand exposed as the Bob Brown Party, and now that Bob Brown has gone so has their raison d'être. The Colonel has a point too about the ACT being fertile Greens territory. Although Colonel in defence of the ACT I have to point out that something like 25% of the ACT workforce is in some sort of defence-related occupation. There's also a lot of people there in the building industry and in retail. Taken with Queanbeyan the Canberra region is a major urban area of something like 400 000 people. Canberra Hospital is the biggest health facility outside Sydney and services an area in southern NSW that's a lot more than just the ACT. But back to the Greens and the ACT. Canberra has always recorded a high vote for the Greens just as it used to for the Democrats. And that's the point isn't it. Once Don Chipp was out of the loop the Democrats were seen as the Don Chipp party that had lost its mojo. Same with the Greens and Bob Brown. What we saw over the weekend in the ACT is that the electorate is polarising towards the two major parties at the expense of the Greens and the other minority fruitcakes. Interesting point, though: there was a swing to Labor of 1.7% (last night's figures). There was a swing to the Libs of 6.5% or thereabouts. There was a swing away from the Greens of 4.6%. Assuming (and it ain't necessarily so) that the 1.7% swing to Labor was made up of ex-Green voters, where did the other 3% anti Green swing go? Go figure!! Does that mean that everyone who in the past has voted Green is not necessarily an ex-Labor voter?? Just asking!! One thingis for sure, I'd rate Adam Bandt's chances in Melbourne as akin to those of a snowflake in hell ... unless of course the Abbott Liberals preference him again!! you reckon Bandt is stuffed in Melbourne...i thought about that after hearing what had happened in Canberra...the only thing against it comes once more back to atypical demographics of an atypical electorate...it may be more atypical than ACT is, even. one things for sure- I bet there arent many DoD employees in Bandts electorate. |
|
