Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 14, 2013 11:04:25 GMT 10
From the Los Angeles Times....Christopher Dorner saga collides with State of the Union speechBy DAVID HORSEY | 5:00AM - Wednesday, February 13, 2013Christopher Dorner saga upstages President Obama's State of the Union speech. — Cartoon: David Horsey/Los Angeles Times/February 13, 2013.WHAT APPEARS to be the fiery finale to Christopher Dorner's violent rampage across Southern California nearly upstaged President Obama's State of the Union address. As the seconds ticked down to the start of the speech, it seemed as though Anderson Cooper and the folks at CNN were awfully reluctant to break away from the burning cabin near Big Bear where the disgruntled, unhinged ex-cop from the Los Angeles Police Department appeared to be holed up.
Nevertheless, the cable news organizations did their duty and switched from the sensational to the substantial. They were rewarded with an unusually news-making speech from Obama. As police officials appeared close to confirming that the deadly Dorner saga had ended, the president was confirming that he is just getting started on an aggressive agenda for the coming year. He said he intends to take action on climate change, gun control, immigration, infrastructure repair, the minimum wage, early childhood education and ending the war in Afghanistan.
The most dramatic moment in the address came near the end when Obama, pushing his firearms safety legislation, cited the multiple victims of gun violence in the audience and to rising applause — significantly, not from Republicans — repeated, over and over, "They deserve a vote!"
If that rhetorical flourish had the feel of a political convention, the Republican response from Florida Senator Marco Rubio, as well as the tea party rejoinder delivered by Kentucky Senator Rand Paul, smelled like stale leftovers from the 2012 campaign trail. Much of Rubio's speech was a personal slap at Obama. The rest was a boilerplate slam of "big government," even as Rubio oddly cited government programs that had helped him achieve success, as well as the Medicare coverage that had made life easier for his parents.
Tuesday was a big night for news. One story was like a action-packed cop show straight from Hollywood, the other was a bit like a political melodrama we have seen many times before. Still, the president gave a good performance and earned whatever audience he was able to grab from the police showdown in the Southern California woods.www.latimes.com/news/politics/topoftheticket/la-na-tt-state-of-the-union-20130212,0,6118894.story
|
|
|
Post by caskur on Feb 14, 2013 18:42:14 GMT 10
I bet American audiences were really jacked off they missed the great cabin burn-down,... fancy not putting the presidents speech on hold and delayed and the real life drama first... I hope they're inundated with complaints.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 16, 2013 10:46:32 GMT 10
From the Los Angeles Times....Stale ideas, not a drink of water, sank Marco Rubio's speechBy DAVID HORSEY | 11:10PM - Thursday, February 14, 2013Marco Rubio had to grab for water during his response to President Obama. — Cartoon: David Horsey/Los Angeles Times/February 14, 2013.IT IS no wonder Florida Senator Marco Rubio needed to grab a bottle of water in the middle of delivering the Republican response to President Obama’s State of the Union address. The speech he was given to recite was like a hunk of stale, dry sourdough and it surely caught in his throat.
For 30 years, Republican aspirants to the presidency have been giving variations of the same speech. It sounded fresh and bold when Ronald Reagan first spoke the words as a candidate in 1980. At that point, the liberal era that began with Franklin D. Roosevelt in 1932 had pretty much run out of gas. Democrats had grown too comfortable with their seemingly permanent lock on the House of Representatives, while their ideas about the creative use of government had devolved into a system of doling out federal dollars to clamoring interest groups.
Reagan declared that government was the problem, not the solution, and that taxes were too high and regulations on business too onerous. It was a winning message and helped bring blue-collar men and the South firmly into the Republican fold.
Rubio spoke the same language on Tuesday night but it sounded like a talking-points memo left over from Mitt Romney’s losing campaign. Rather than looking like a young man with new ideas, Rubio looked like a novice with no thoughts of his own.
Rubio tried to portray the president’s address as just another crazy liberal, tax-and-spend, big-government screed. That only made it more obvious that his own speech had been written well before Obama spoke. When Rubio chastised the president for failing to address the financial problems of Medicare, he looked a bit silly, because Obama had, in fact, spoken about creating a bipartisan plan to fix Medicare, one that will demand compromise from Democrats.
Rubio’s so-called response was not a real response at all. It was just another attack on the Republicans’ fictitious, scary version of Obama, a straw man that Romney went after in the 2012 campaign with no good result.
One of these days, Republicans will have to realize they need to compete with the real Obama, not their talk-radio version of him. And they must face up to a bigger problem, one exemplified by Rubio’s talk: The country has actually changed since 1980. There was, indeed, a Reagan revolution, followed by a Clinton accommodation, during which taxes did come down sharply, regulations were eliminated, welfare was reformed and the GOP took over the House. Republicans actually won most of what they wanted, but it is apparently easier for them to deny their victory than it is to acknowledge that things have not worked out quite as they promised.
A poorly regulated financial and banking sector was set free to run wild and nearly wrecked the economy. Lower taxes allowed the wealthy to become super-rich, but the promise of more jobs and higher salaries in a low-tax environment has not been realized for the middle class and working poor. All but a narrow slice of Americans at the very top are working harder and making less money than they did three decades ago. And big government? The highest rate of unemployment today is among ex-government workers.
Rubio’s speech was likely received well by the members of the old Reagan coalition. The problem for him and his GOP compatriots, though, is that there is a new coalition of minorities, women and young people that prefers Obama’s vision of effective government to the Reagan vision of hobbled government.
Rubio shouldn’t have been reaching for a mere bottle of water. What he really needed was a stiff drink chased with a big dose of reality.www.latimes.com/news/politics/topoftheticket/la-na-tt-marco-rubios-speech-20130214,0,5463463.story
|
|