|
|
Post by caskur on Feb 27, 2023 16:09:39 GMT 10
Finally after 25 years of me saying aborigines are from India they are now claiming they are... something I already knew btw ONCE I saw an Indian artwork I recognised the connection but they are still trying to say abos started off in Australia....lol they gotta say something for their decades of getting it wrong and lying.. they will never admit they're wrong they'll just work in the story with their evolution crappolla narrative. There are like serious clues....one, sandlewood only native to India and Western Australia.... www.australiangeographic.com.au/news/2013/01/aboriginal-genes-suggest-indian-migration/#:~:text=The%20researchers%20say%20this%20supports,generation%20span%20of%2030%20years. |
|
|
|
Post by fat on Feb 27, 2023 20:57:13 GMT 10
Whenever the megafauna started to disappear is when they arrived.
|
|
|
|
Post by Stellar on Mar 1, 2023 8:35:41 GMT 10
I think we've been talking about this for quite a while. This is the latest thing I said on the subject - back in 2016 ....
.... Aboriginals have at least 11% Indian DNA. That Indians came to this continent about 4 thousand years ago, bringing their dogs - the ancestor of the dingo - and their tools ... elevating the existing aboriginals into the stone age. That the same Indian DNA doesn't appear in any New Guinean natives. What we don't know is how many aboriginals were actually living - existing? - here before the arrival of the Indians but there probably weren't many. What we do know is that the Indians probably brought disease with them which might explain the complete collapse of the original languages of the existing aborigines. All this happened in the Holocene period - approx. 4 thousand years ago. "Modern" day aboriginals evolved from that influence, if anyone could possibly refer to aboriginals as "modern."
I'd like to see more studies done on the DNA of aboriginals. But most aboriginals won't agree to be part of these studies. Now I wonder why?
There is also an ancient association between the genomes of Australian Abos, New Guineans, and the Mamanwa — a Negrito group from the Philippines. It is confirmed that these populations diverged from each other around 36,000 years ago, suggesting that they all descended from an early southward migration out of Africa.
Were these the original Aboriginals who were displaced by the more advanced Indians when they arrived?
There have been several instances where Indian migrants to this country have tried to take advantage of this association by claiming to be Aboriginal due to their shared DNA. This they believed would lead to a bounty of welfare largesse by the authorities which would set them up for life. But they were knocked back, lol.
|
|
|
|
Post by caskur on Mar 1, 2023 20:20:24 GMT 10
I know how many were living in Australia before Indians.... None.
And I do not think there is only 11% Indian blood...
There is at least 50 % Indian and the other 50% is European...
Africans came to WA as well. The Bradshaw cave carvings and boab trees prove Africans made it here...
The fact sandlewood is native to India and Western Australia is a HUGE link but I first thought of the idea Aborigines were Indian was seeing some Indian ancient art and they were DOT paintings... Bali is Hindu which is an Indian religion. Proof the Indians reached Bali.
There is a brain washing going on in the media and it is, that aborigines OWN the land. They do NOT own the land or did not own the land. They occupied it. That is not the same thing.
The racism towards the original settlers and their ancestors is despicable....I am calling it out and we should all do the same.
|
|
|
|
Post by caskur on Mar 1, 2023 20:33:23 GMT 10
DARLING Dazza from the groups 20 years ago used to say the current abos displaced the Australian Pygmy... and wiped them out.
I think they probably only lived on the east coast and probably came from New Guinea but don't know much about them...
I am incensed that kids are not learning REAL History, just the new reinvention fictional version of bullshit which is politically motivated.
And if you try and write that on platforms like Twitter or fb you get censored.
|
|
|
|
Post by Stellar on Mar 2, 2023 8:35:38 GMT 10
Actually, sandalwood is native all through the Malay Archipelago from India down to northern Australia and Indonesia. Indian and Australian sandalwood are not the same. The Indian stuff is twice as expensive because of the oils. You can also find sandalwood in Hawaii and the Pacific Islands. The New Guinea sandalwood is of poorer quality.
|
|
|
|
Post by caskur on Mar 3, 2023 2:22:26 GMT 10
Actually, sandalwood is native all through the Malay Archipelago from India down to northern Australia and Indonesia. Indian and Australian sandalwood are not the same. The Indian stuff is twice as expensive because of the oils. You can also find sandalwood in Hawaii and the Pacific Islands. The New Guinea sandalwood is of poorer quality. This is the first time I have heard about Hawaii. Interesting. One of my dads childhood friends runs around our Sth West harvesting Sandalwood. I only know our native Sandlewood in the southwest corner is the same as the Indian Sandalwood. The only other thing I know is, they have planted WA Sandalwood in NT for future harvesting. WIKI says this.... we might be talking about two different species or more Santalum spicatum "Waang" redirects here. For other uses, see Waang (disambiguation). Santalum spicatum, the Australian sandalwood, also Waang and other names (Noongar) and Dutjahn (Martu), is a tree native to semi-arid areas at the edge of Southwest Australia, in the state of Western Australia. It is also found in South Australia, where it is protected and listed as a vulnerable species. It is traded as sandalwood, and its sandalwood oil has been used as an aromatic and a food source over history. S. spicatum is one of four Santalum species occurring in Australia. It is a WA native plant shipped all over the world. If it's in Hawaii I would say the Hawaiians do to our sandalwood like they did to Macadamia nuts (spelling?) |
|
|
|
Post by caskur on Mar 3, 2023 2:46:17 GMT 10
Actually, sandalwood is native all through the Malay Archipelago from India down to northern Australia and Indonesia. Indian and Australian sandalwood are not the same. The Indian stuff is twice as expensive because of the oils. You can also find sandalwood in Hawaii and the Pacific Islands. The New Guinea sandalwood is of poorer quality. It isn't native to Malaysia or Hawaii or New Guinea .. it is native in WA and has been shipped around the world since colonization... this is from WA Gov. It is actually hard to grow and propagate. I am wondering how many varieties there are... www.wa.gov.au/organisation/forest-products-commission/western-australian-sandalwood |
|
|
|
Post by caskur on Mar 3, 2023 2:58:47 GMT 10
OK there are 15 different varieties of sandalwood...
And Australia and India are the most coveted...
In other words the other varieties are shit.....lol
I KNOW both Indian and WA sandalwood are endangered and that is a bad thing
|
|
