|
Post by pim on Jun 13, 2021 0:45:53 GMT 10
The guy has all the arrogance and over-inflated sense of entitlement of his class and his sex ..
|
|
|
Post by ponto on Jun 13, 2021 9:48:17 GMT 10
Porter took on highly positioned people, barristers and people who went to elite schools with influence....while one doesn't know him personally, judging by what is seen and read about him...he isn't a nice person who had visions of being PM of Australia, a person who has chosen politics not as a vocation to do good, to fulfil his own ego.
In short suck eggs Porter ya self centred maggot.
|
|
|
Post by matte on Jun 13, 2021 12:45:31 GMT 10
He should appeal this ruling. No rape has been proven. The judge couldn't even come to this decision on the "balance of probabilities".
|
|
|
Post by ponto on Jun 13, 2021 12:56:00 GMT 10
The alleged rape remains the alleged rape....this is about a defamation case on the ABC because they made news that a Cabinet Minister has been accused of rape. The ABC didn't mention his name though including myself people jumped to the conclusion it was Porter, given his known past history with women.
Though Porter was advised he could not win the case and in his arrogance he took it on thinking being the Attorney General he had all the power and smarts, well he didn't there were people smarter than him.
Porter and Robo Debt infliction suffering on thousands of people deserves what he gets..call it justice.
|
|
|
Post by caskur on Jun 13, 2021 16:29:11 GMT 10
Porter took on highly positioned people, barristers and people who went to elite schools with influence....while one doesn't know him personally, judging by what is seen and read about him...he isn't a nice person who had visions of being PM of Australia, a person who has chosen politics not as a vocation to do good, to fulfil his own ego. In short suck eggs Porter ya self centred maggot. Yep, he is a maggot alright... a maggot with a hunchback....EWWWW!!!
|
|
|
Post by caskur on Jun 13, 2021 16:31:47 GMT 10
He should appeal this ruling. No rape has been proven. The judge couldn't even come to this decision on the "balance of probabilities". True but I bet he has done other things to pay for. Wasn't he one of the robo-debt collectors? I hope he shakes hands with a moving train. Good riddance to bad rubbish.
|
|
|
Post by ponto on Jun 13, 2021 19:51:38 GMT 10
Robo debt was a construct of Christian Porter, Alan Tudge, Stuart Roberts and Scott Morrison.....Snorter sorry Porter declared it all legal despite advisors saying it was dodgy.
|
|
|
Post by matte on Jun 13, 2021 19:59:50 GMT 10
Robodebt was bad, no doubt about it.
But having a bad policy doesn't mean a person should be wrongly accused of rape as payback.
|
|
|
Post by bender on Jun 13, 2021 20:05:45 GMT 10
He should appeal this ruling. No rape has been proven. The judge couldn't even come to this decision on the "balance of probabilities". You clearly don't understand what is going on Matte. Ms Dyer, who petitioned the court in regards to the involvement of Porter's Lawyer, Ms Chrysanthou received a letter from Porter's lawyers threatening to ask the court to impose a $150,000 surety on her in anticipation of being able to claim costs against her in the event that the Judge ruled against her petition. In doing so they moved from a neutral position to an adversarial one and consequently the Judge has decided that due to Ms Dyer's petition prevailing that Porter and his Legal Team are now liable for her costs. It has absolutely nothing to do with Porter raping or not raping anyone. Given Porter's false bravado the other day where he made a series of outlandish (and false) claims about the outcome from his legal stoush with the ABC I think this is absolutely fucking hilarious.
|
|
|
Post by caskur on Jun 13, 2021 23:35:04 GMT 10
Robo debt was a construct of Christian Porter, Alan Tudge, Stuart Roberts and Scott Morrison.....Snorter sorry Porter declared it all legal despite advisors saying it was dodgy. I hope that bastard tops himself.
|
|