|
Post by Yassir Rebob on Jun 13, 2017 16:40:01 GMT 10
According to quantum physics, there's life Jim, but not as we know it.
|
|
|
Post by pim on Jun 13, 2017 19:13:52 GMT 10
Quantum physics? Now there's a refreshingly new angle. Certainly superior to "delusional" or "gullible", "mumbo jumbo", gratuitous ethnic slurs or sneers regarding work history.
|
|
|
Post by Occam's Spork on Jun 27, 2017 9:38:19 GMT 10
Actually it was Ktj with his trite/banal 'who created God?' question. Some atheists need fresher material. KTJ's question prompted the tired old "first cause" stuff again, which is not exactly the same thing. You went on to demonstrate the flaw in the "logic" about "first cause" by stopping at your "god" - like all theists do. You can't (won't) see the error in that logic so the discussion is hopeless (yet again). Not exactly. I pointed out the naturalists blatant flaw that all universes must follow the same Laws as our own. For me, ultimate consciousness does not exist any realm of our current experience. Is it so improbable that it might have come from outside of our universe? Is it possible that source could also contain the attributes of God. I'm asking you to at least consider these things.
|
|
|
Post by Occam's Spork on Jun 27, 2017 9:42:25 GMT 10
On the atheistic view, things such as love and beauty really have no meaning. It is mere chemistry, molecules in motion, no different than fizz in a pop can. Yet wishful thinking is superimposed and the atheist self-deceives into believing love and beauty have meaning.
My point is: Theists aren't the only ones who accept things without proof, Earl.
'No proof ' is simply that. It's not synonymous with nonexistent.
|
|
|
Post by Occam's Spork on Jun 27, 2017 10:36:58 GMT 10
Religionists are gullible enough to believe anything without proof. I can believe several accurate things about you; though we've never actually met.
|
|