Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 30, 2012 16:16:47 GMT 10
Comparing the worst of heterosexuality with the 'best' of homosexual 'parenting' is hardly objective. Well, you are definitely in the worst of hetrosexual category. You have rammed religious lies into your children because you are desperate to brainwash them with it before they become old enough to decide for themselves that it is utter bullshit. And that is CHILD ABUSE. In other words you are a CHILD ABUSER. That is SICK!! Oh so you've decided that everyone else's views are wrong and we can't bring our children up to the values we determine correct? You see I don't mind you disagreeing with those views that's your democratic right but to have the cheek ( and stupidity ) to call it CHILD ABUSE shows how remarkably stupid you are to believe people will fall for your line of drivel. As for being SICK - well lets see - weren't you the guy who posted an animated gif of a little boy giving Jesus oral sex ? You remember the gif you gleefully posted called Jesus_blo.gif ? I remember that. So here we have a man in his fifties (KTJ) who posts animated gifs of a young boy blowing an adult then has the audacity to accuse others of CHILD ABUSE and being SICK? Are you that sick in the head that you would find such images entertaining enough to post? I don't think animated gifs of children blowing adults are in the least entertaining and I wouldn't 1) posses them 2) post them. You seem to think that's okay though. And you have the audacity to accuse parents who teach the 10 commandments to their kids of being CHILD ABUSERS and SICK? I'll leave others to draw their own conclusions to your state of mind/integrity.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 30, 2012 16:24:15 GMT 10
Court records are littered with trial transcripts of religionists indulging in unlawful sick sexual activities with kids.
Just like in that animated gif, which is a reminder of what some sick religionists are really like.
But you, being a religionist, I could understand why you would want to sweep reality beneath the carpet.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 30, 2012 16:53:20 GMT 10
Court records are littered with trial transcripts of religionists indulging in unlawful sick sexual activities with kids.
Of course, child sexual abuse is not however limited to religionists. Atheists too have their share of unlawful sick sexual activities with kids. Is that the best you can do to divert attention from your posting an animated gif showing a young boy performing oral sex on an adult? And if you thought religionist paedophile activity so vile why did you post an animated gif on the subject?
Just like in that animated gif, which is a reminder of what some sick religionists are really like.
if the gif is a sick reminder why did you post an animated gif of a child performing oral sex on an adult - surely if you are consistent it would be revolting and you wouldn't post it?
But you, being a religionist, I could understand why you would want to sweep reality beneath the carpet
Why should I? Nowhere in the Bible does it promote child sexual abuse and those who do such activitities face judgment day with some terrible things to account for. Religionist or not if you indulge in that activity you deserve to be punished.
Besides how does posting an animated gif of a little boy blowing an adult help? There is no evidence at all of any sexual activity of Jesus so how does you as a 50's something adult male posting pedophile style gifs help things?
|
|
|
Post by jody on Oct 30, 2012 17:11:25 GMT 10
No he is headed for hell but it's his choice and he seems happy with it.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 30, 2012 17:18:02 GMT 10
Agreed Jody, hell is locked from the inside.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 30, 2012 17:39:57 GMT 10
Famous atheists last words before dying Romans 1:20
New International Version (NIV)
20 For since the creation of the world God’s invisible qualities—his eternal power and divine nature—have been clearly seen, being understood from what has been made, so that people are without excuse. I want people to understand that I say these things not because I am a good person rather for what Jesus has done for me. I am no better than anyone here - it is Jesus' sacrifice that saves me not my own efforts.
|
|
|
Post by jody on Oct 30, 2012 18:21:09 GMT 10
Buzz that is your choice to believe that, it is our choice to believe in what we believe. I have had too much proof in my i[life to believe otherwise. Live and let live is my motto.
|
|
|
Post by jody on Oct 30, 2012 18:39:54 GMT 10
whatever you think is a good thing Buzz. I'm happy you have your own beliefs just as I do.
|
|
|
Post by garfield on Oct 30, 2012 19:41:36 GMT 10
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 31, 2012 10:56:40 GMT 10
I believe it is a fact that Ur of the Chaldeans did not exist at the time of Abraham. The religions teach that those things are the case - but history has proven the religions lie I believe. peterjfast.com/tag/chaldeans/In Genesis 11:26-29 we see the first mention of Abraham (mentions him as Abram). Through a genealogy we see people such as: his father Terah, his nephew Lot, and in verse 29 we see his marriage with Sarai, later to become Sarah. Now, the Bible does not actually state that Abraham was born in Ur, but it does say in 11:28, “And Haran died before his father Terah in his native land, in Ur of the Chaldeans.” Since Ur is considered the “native land” of Haran, we can then presume this is where Abraham lived as well. Yet, before we move on, one interesting thing is where it states, “Ur of the Chaldeans.” This is the first time in the Bible where the reference to the people of the Chaldeans, is mentioned. The other two major occurrences outside the book of Genesis are in Nehemiah 9:7, and Acts 7:4. What is interesting is that during the time of Abraham the people called, Chaldeans did not exist and when Nehemiah and Acts were written, the Chaldeans had come and gone. So what is this saying then? Well, the book of Genesis is the key. Basically, when Moses wrote what is now called “Genesis” or “Beri’shit” in Hebrew, meaning, “beginning,” the Chaldeans did exist, but there were at least four places called Ur. So Moses attached the people group to the specific city so his readers would know which “Ur” he was speaking about. Thus, we get in all three cases, Abraham being named as coming from Ur of the Chaldeans, or the Ur where the Chaldeans would later settle by. Problem solved.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 31, 2012 18:04:41 GMT 10
And yet another religious (Christian) sicko busted for "you know what".
Read all about it HERE.
Take note of how he isn't a Roman Catholic priest, but is was instead (until he was found out) a pastor of one of those "hallelujah praise the lord" fundy churches that Matty-boy loves so much.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 31, 2012 19:54:14 GMT 10
Like the proudly pronounced skeptic view that the Hittites didn't exist either? ;D
Not the first time the skeptics have got it wrong and won't be the last.
|
|
|
Post by slartibartfast on Oct 31, 2012 22:26:20 GMT 10
a) There is no such thing as judgement day. Don't try to threaten me with some non-existent piece of hocus pocus. And if there actually was a judgement day, I'd be much better judged than you. I do not hate Muslims, I do not hate gays, I accept people for what they are. You don't. b) I am not the one to have to hang my head in shame as I don't believe that everything fits into a neat little box where only the combination of male/female can make good parents. Sometimes male/female are the worst possible parents and children of male/male or female/female parents end up with much more love than the children of a "normal" marriage. But you just keep sprouting your outdated religious waffle. It amuses the hell out of us. Im sure it does amuse you, but one day it won't. We'll see Slarti, we'll see. You can deny a child the right to a mum and dad but you'll have to bare the shame of it, and denying that won't help you. You should be ashamed to deny a child the right to a mum and dad for the sake of political correctness. There will be an accounting one day. What drugs are you taking? Where have I denied a child anything? It is YOU that would rather a child be in loveless violent upbringing than one that is loving. It has nothing to do with political correctness, it has everything to do with the safety of the child, which is something YOU don't seem to care about. Shame.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 31, 2012 23:20:42 GMT 10
Where have I denied a child anything?.Where you permit homosexuals or lesbians to adopt your are denying the child either a mother or father. Two homosexuals cannot be a mother and likewise two lesbians cannot be a father. You are denying the child the right to a mum and dad. Shame ON YOU.
|
|
|
Post by slartibartfast on Nov 1, 2012 6:24:52 GMT 10
It is YOU that would rather a child be in loveless violent upbringing than one that is loving. It has nothing to do with political correctness, it has everything to do with the safety of the child, which is something YOU don't seem to care about.
Shame.
|
|