|
Post by chequeredflaggg on Feb 3, 2013 8:02:39 GMT 10
re#6 Geo I agree. Of course he was framed. Some clever dick broke into his home AND stole his phone (to make calls on to the knock shop) AND stole his credit card(s) (to pay the girls with) AND stole his drivers licence (so the guilty party could provide photo ID when he was paying with the credit cards) AND then returned the above items. All without poor Mr Thomson & his wife knowing anything about it. Not once mind you, but what is it 149 times. Yes he was definitely set up . Of course there is only one person that sneeky, that much of a mongrel, that smart who would gain from such deeds. Your right... Tony A "sneeky" "Your" Has Phil actually not got , or cant find, anything better to do?
|
|
|
Post by slartibartfast on Feb 3, 2013 8:08:41 GMT 10
Yes, Stockton, let's forget all about innocent till proven guilty, eh? you mean like Zimmerman, in Florida? All I asked for was a trial. You told us he was innocent.
|
|
|
Post by slartibartfast on Feb 3, 2013 8:10:29 GMT 10
As in, no case to answer.
|
|
|
Post by chequeredflaggg on Feb 3, 2013 8:31:49 GMT 10
yes, I did...and I was right that he was innocent, wasnt I?
|
|
|
Post by chequeredflaggg on Feb 3, 2013 8:32:35 GMT 10
after all..you have just there been reaffirming that its innocent till proved guilty.
|
|
|
Post by chequeredflaggg on Feb 3, 2013 8:33:15 GMT 10
you well and truly asserted that he was guilty, btw..
I can obviously call witnesses to that fact.
|
|
|
Post by garfield on Feb 3, 2013 8:40:30 GMT 10
Yes, Stockton, let's forget all about innocent till proven guilty, eh? you mean like Zimmerman, in Florida? Or the DJ's
|
|
|
Post by slartibartfast on Feb 3, 2013 8:47:08 GMT 10
yes, I did...and I was right that he was innocent, wasnt I? Have you? Trial starts soon.
|
|
|
Post by Lord Stockton on Feb 3, 2013 20:59:54 GMT 10
re#23
"Now Abbott who is known for creating slush funds too assassinate his opponents then it would be no surprise if behind the machinations of this stunt was Abbott and his cronies just as Slippper was assassinated."
Spindrift are you seriously suggesting Abbott is behind Thomson "framing" as Geo says?
Come on man even Thomson hasn't suggested that. In fact at one stage early in this drama, Thomson said he knew who used the credit cards but would not name them. Second, don't you think that the statement he made to Parliament last year would have been the time to name Abbott if there was even the slighest chance your statement is correct? Third, the Police bail conditions include him from NOT making contact with certain 'ladies'. Unless the police happened to pick names from the Sydney phone book, what are the chances Thomson knows the people in question?
Come on, even Geo knows I was setting him up to bite which he didn't (shame).
PS so Slipper was assassinated? You don't think his emails (which Slipper has never denied sending) did the job with out help from Abbott or his 'cronies'?
And as for settting up slush funds - Australia's self confessed expert is your Julia. Cons the AWU executive, lies to a state government body & is then fired (sorry - resigned) by the partners of her legal practice.
|
|
|
Post by garfield on Feb 5, 2013 9:18:04 GMT 10
|
|