|
Post by caskur on Apr 26, 2022 16:26:11 GMT 10
The funniest comment by Lady C of late is the bus load of oldies touring Windsor and spotting Meghan and Harry walking the grounds and none of the bus tour had cameras. And Harry and Meghan never once walked those grounds when they lived there at Frogmore Cottage which is on the estate.....lol
The Harkles set it up.
|
|
|
Post by Stellar on Apr 26, 2022 20:20:51 GMT 10
Begging for a handout! They're getting over $100 million from Netflix and apparently aren't doing much to earn that. In fact their last offering - was met with a very lukewarm response from the public. Most people find them quite irrelevant these days. Hypercritical climate change warriors lecturing to the masses about cutting their ecological footprints whilst they themselves continue to fly around the globe in private jets and live the high life. And doing their utmost to destroy the royal family in the process. Neither of the Sussexes can be described as family-friendly - both having cut off any cordial relations and putting the boot in at every opportunity especially when they can make several million from it. I think Netflix is going to make a big loss from these two greedy money-grubbers. they wont be personally pocketing 1 billion... IF it really was 1 billion they were paid, it would be for costs carting the film crew around the globe.. the press make things up especially where money and the Harkles are concerned. the reason why netflix will lose money is because those 2 have become pariahs... everybody hates them now. And they aren't really Royals anymore. They were getting 100 million - not one thousand million which equals one billion! The $100 million they are getting is their fee to do various projects and it's quite obvious they haven't done much at all as Netflix has had to keep pushing them to get on with it. But they don't have to pay anything for the filming and crew - that is Netflix's responsibility. And as Netflix sent a full crew of 30 to film the games - or should I say - to film Harry and Meghan upstaging the games, I think they're gonna be on a financial loser.
|
|
|
Post by caskur on Apr 27, 2022 7:57:47 GMT 10
It's not true... the amount they are supposedly getting is undisclosed according to the New York Times. And the amount is spread over so many years. When it comes to the Harkles and all their fanciful claims you have to remain sceptical. They are so full of shit it is gobsmacking. They have admitted publicly they are mental cases. Meghan once told a high school friend she was both male and female, errrm had both male and female bits...She will absolutely do or say anything for attention. I can't say that about Harry because his whole life has been in the public eye. Attention is normal for him. I think they went to California to do drugs actually. Just tossing it out there. Harry (who is a sober alcoholic supposedly) drank at the Invictus Games but kept it one large beer.... everybody KNOWS alkies can never start drinking again once they have achieved sobriety or they go back to where they started, even going as far as drinking themselves to death. Harry and Meghan both previously have done drugs. Are they still into it?. I'd put my money on yes... Meghan's father was hooked on cocaine. He probably moved to Mexico because the cocaine was cheaper. I don't like her father, he has said at least 2 things I found off putting. The first thing was, he said it is time Meghan gave him more money to pay him back for all the college fees he forked out...Since when do kids have to pay back parents? It was his tone I didn't like. The second off putting comment he made was after Lily was born and that went something like this, 'good, more Markle blood in the royal family', to me, that was such a stupid thing to say... but it again was his tone that sounded ominous. I think it is terrible she dumped her whole family, both sides and the children are denied relationships with their extended family. Maybe by doing that they don't have to acknowledge birthays and Chrissy pressies, I was musing the other day how the bitch said the Queen doesn't own the word royal but high and unmighty Nutmeg wants to own the word archetype....lol
|
|
|
Post by nataliesalat on May 1, 2022 18:33:11 GMT 10
|
|
|
Post by caskur on May 2, 2022 1:00:57 GMT 10
Need more royal bagging to perk you up heh? Did you know onions were off the royal menu?
|
|
|
Post by nataliesalat on May 2, 2022 1:44:52 GMT 10
I hate the British Royals but i wouldn't mind being a Royal in the federated German Empire or the Austro-Hungarian Empire.
|
|
|
Post by caskur on May 2, 2022 13:40:22 GMT 10
If they died tomorrow there would be rejoicing in the streets. They insulted the English public and while the Queen might forgive them, the English public won't.
|
|
|
Post by caskur on May 2, 2022 13:46:30 GMT 10
I hate the British Royals but i wouldn't mind being a Royal in the federated German Empire or the Austro-Hungarian Empire. What do you hate about them? The fact they raise billions for charity? Actually if they retired and lived off their accumulated wealth and passed off all the charities, maybe you could raise the money instead... or one of the corrupt republican countries leaders could raise the billions. Sound like a plan to you?
|
|
|
Post by caskur on Jun 28, 2022 1:06:55 GMT 10
I want to bring up the issue of Lilibet and whether or not she belongs to Harry. There are only 2 pictures of her that I have seen.. To me she is the spitting image of Harry sporting his red hair however her hair is very straight. If MeAgain is her real mother why is Lilbet's hair straight and not kinky/Afro?
The eye colour should be brown or green but it isn't obvious in the coloured photo what colour they really are. It would have been obvious in the other clearer photo but they made that into a black and white picture. That disguises Lilibet's eye colour. Did they do that disguising deliberatly?
I am just wondering about the anomaly. Anyone else wondering?
|
|
|
Post by Gort on Jun 28, 2022 8:33:02 GMT 10
I had dark eyes when young but they changed to greenish later on.
As for hair type, the kids are 1/4 afro compared to 1/2 afro Meghan.
Genetic mix and match has many different characteristics.
|
|
|
Post by Stellar on Jun 28, 2022 13:16:33 GMT 10
She uses a lot of straighteners!!
|
|
|
Post by Gort on Jun 28, 2022 15:00:25 GMT 10
Archie, Lilibet and Meghan all have that slightly turned in right eye.
|
|
|
Post by ponto on Jun 28, 2022 15:04:19 GMT 10
I ain't worrying coz I couldn't give a shit...about any of em...!!
|
|
|
Post by caskur on Jun 28, 2022 16:51:46 GMT 10
Archie, Lilibet and Meghan all have that slightly turned in right eye. The Kid should still should have Afro hair.... not straight. When I was growing up my primary school got all the 10 pound poms and Italian immigrants. And we had 3 blonde girls from the UK with kinky hair. You might dilute a skin tone but afro hair remains a stubborn feature. People are claiming (and I think its wrong) that baby has Harry's baby photo chopped over it. There is no mistaking she's Harrys. That baby photo isn't chopped I believe. I do think she belongs to Harry however Meghan is devious... something isn't quite right. Sooner or later we will know if we were right or wrong. Babies have blue eyes then they change to green or grey as they age (or stay blue). Brown eyes don't change at all. Meghans second toe is longer than her big toe. The Christmas family shot shows the baby has the same feature. We'll have wait and see if bubbies hair develops the kink.
|
|
|
Post by caskur on Jun 28, 2022 16:57:49 GMT 10
I ain't worrying coz I couldn't give a shit...about any of em...!! You ran from this group like a big sook, ya big sook....
|
|
|
Post by caskur on Jun 28, 2022 17:00:38 GMT 10
She uses a lot of straighteners!! they get their hair permed straight.
|
|
|
Post by caskur on Jul 11, 2022 21:20:09 GMT 10
www.express.co.uk/news/royal/1632111/Meghan-Markle-news-Samantha-Markle-legal-case-defamation-lawsuit-latest-updateMeghan Markle's bitter war with sister Samantha to rage on as Duchess' legal bid FAILS MEGHAN MARKLE has filed a new attempt to have her half-sister's defamation lawsuit dismissed after her first was rejected. Meghan Markle's bitter war with sister Samantha to rage on as Duchess' legal bid FAILS MEGHAN MARKLE has filed a new attempt to have her half-sister's defamation lawsuit dismissed after her first was rejected. By DYLAN DONNELLY 10:40, Tue, Jun 28, 2022 | UPDATED: 13:07, Tue, Jun 28, 2022 Meghan Markle’s half sister says Duchess ‘didn’t reach out’ to dad Samantha Markle filed a defamation lawsuit against the Duchess of Sussex in March over Meghan’s sit-down interview with Oprah Winfrey in 2021. The royal was alleged to have lied about her family, and was accused by Samatha of making up stories about growing up in "virtual poverty”. The Duchess of Sussex first filed a motion to dismiss Samantha's allegations against her on June 17. However it was denied as moot because Samantha filed an amended complaint. In new court documents, the former ‘Suits’ star argued against her half-sister's claims in her "meritless defamation case." The Duchess alleged in the documents that her sibling "deleted numerous specific factual allegations and exhibits from her original complaint," claiming that the facts would "completely undermine" Samantha's case. The documents added: “Most obviously, her original complaint attached a 2018 email from Meghan to the then-Communications Secretary of Kensington Palace, Jason Knauf, that Plaintiff alleged was the basis for the allegedly defamatory statements in Finding Freedom. "However, the email on its face disproved Plaintiff's claim that Meghan was somehow responsible for the authors' allegedly defamatory statements in 'Finding Freedom.'" Meghan's motion further alleged in the documents obtained by Us Weekly: "Indeed, in her desperation to save her case, Plaintiff quite literally fabricated one of the statements, as evidenced by the missing interview transcript." In the new motion, Meghan argued that this matter "has no place" in any court. The Duchess argued: "We do not empanel juries to rule on whether two people are 'close,' or whether one genuinely feels that they 'grew up as an only child.' “Courts are not equipped to adjudicate the legitimacy of a person's feelings about their childhood and relationships. Nor should they be.”
|
|
|
Post by Gort on Jul 19, 2022 12:47:33 GMT 10
|
|
|
Post by nataliesalat on Aug 2, 2022 7:00:44 GMT 10
there was this fiction piece in the 1990s when i first got online where a fairy or brownie curses Prince Charles and when Diana sees the result, she says "you've turned him back into a baby boy!" and the fairy responds softly: "you might want to check between its legs".
|
|
|
Post by Gort on Aug 2, 2022 13:58:11 GMT 10
|
|
|
Post by caskur on Aug 5, 2022 10:16:37 GMT 10
Great stuff indeed. Lady C reviewing Tom Bower's book about Megsey Babe... Did you know the palace staff call Harry, BJ Harry? BJ standing for Blow Job Harry. That is how Meghan caught him... Blow Jobs on demand...lol
|
|
|
Post by caskur on Aug 11, 2022 18:30:57 GMT 10
My husband bought me the book by surprise.....lol It's attractively packaged in black with metallic gold trim however I have covered it in yellow plastic. ally auto address
|
|
|
Post by caskur on Aug 14, 2022 0:01:11 GMT 10
You know that disgusting idiot fake philanthropic piece of garbage MeAgain wore a £56,000 Ralph and Russo dress on the night of 27th November 2017 on the public announcement of her engagement...?
Page 174.
Sheer wickedness.
|
|
|
Post by Stellar on Aug 14, 2022 8:49:45 GMT 10
You know that disgusting idiot fake philanthropic piece of garbage MeAgain wore a £56,000 Ralph and Russo dress on the night of 27th November 2017 on the public announcement of her engagement...? Page 174. Sheer wickedness. Ralph and Russo are the Australian designers who own that designer label. They were put into administration because of the pandemic. No Oscars and other huge global events during the pandemic where the stars spend up BIG. Meghan would get into furious rows with the royal aides over the racks of freebie designer labels pouring into Kensington Palace for her to wear. Staff warned Meghan that it breached royal protocol to keep free clothes. They advised Meghan that it might be perfectly acceptable for an actress to accept freebie designer clothing but it is not the done thing when you are a member of the royal family. But Meghan being privileged and entitled felt it was her right to benefit from the largesse of others due to her exalted position as a duchess. She just didn't get it. She wanted to be the new Diana - loved and feted by all for her style and grace and beautiful clothes but she will never replace Diana who promoted British fashion and was an icon. Meghan is just a greedy, grasping, social climbing, wanna be. And boofhead Harry is an idiot for letting her carry on like this but then he doesn't have a say in anything these days.
|
|
|
Post by caskur on Aug 14, 2022 16:51:55 GMT 10
Lol... wait until you read the new book.
|
|