|
Post by slartibartfast on Mar 2, 2013 23:24:14 GMT 10
Men face teen sex crime charges in BallinaDetectives in northern NSW have charged three men have with sex offences involving a 15-year-old girl. Officers from Strike Force Bissenberger, which was formed in June last year, arrested two men at a house shortly after midnight on Saturday, while the third man was arrested at his home about 1.30am (AEDT), police said. All three were taken to Ballina Police Station. A 39-year-old man was charged with two counts of aggravated sexual assault of a victim aged under 16; and a 37-year-old man and a 41-year-old man were charged with one count each of aggravated sexual assault of a victim aged under 16. The men were refused bail and were due to appear in Lismore Court on Saturday. Detective Inspector Greg Moore commended the work of his detectives. "It is a tribute to their dedication and skill that we have been able to put these people before the court," he said news.ninemsn.com.au/national/2013/03/02/13/01/men-face-teen-sex-crime-charges-in-ballinaI'll await for Stellar, Floggg and Garfluff to demand their immediate deportation.
|
|
|
Post by caskur on Mar 3, 2013 0:31:01 GMT 10
why? hanging is better!
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 3, 2013 5:48:36 GMT 10
Ballina is safe Nationals seat.....therefore all Nationals are rapist.
|
|
|
Post by garfield on Mar 3, 2013 5:55:15 GMT 10
Ballina is safe Nationals seat.....therefore all Nationals are rapist. Now yer gettin the hang of it ;D
|
|
|
Post by garfield on Mar 3, 2013 5:56:56 GMT 10
Lefty logic at work here again ... ie. because we have our own home grown sex offenders we should also import them in from the middle east as well.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 3, 2013 6:23:45 GMT 10
While most Sri Lankan's are merely country shoppers and should be deported, given a considerable percentage are deemed non refugee and are deported anyway ...one offender out of thousands isn't bad, ..what is bad is out of fear and loathing branding them all criminals....but that is Rightie logic in it....nothing else to yabber on about other than persecuting asylum seekers....and that is just catering for the low wits in society..
|
|
|
Post by geopol on Mar 3, 2013 7:23:17 GMT 10
How about exporting a few of our own home grown? Abbott could go first, then selected liberal party members and so on as the needs arise....Perhaps China would be the most apropriate place as it is the bastion of modern capitalism and their entrepreneurial skills could no doubt thrive there, especially those of our most noble small businessmen....
|
|
|
Post by slartibartfast on Mar 3, 2013 7:32:39 GMT 10
While most Sri Lankan's are merely country shoppers and should be deported, given a considerable percentage are deemed non refugee and are deported anyway ...one offender out of thousands isn't bad, ..what is bad is out of fear and loathing branding them all criminals....but that is Rightie logic in it....nothing else to yabber on about other than persecuting asylum seekers....and that is just catering for the low wits in society.. Not just the "low" wits.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 3, 2013 7:43:58 GMT 10
Lefty logic at work here again ... ie. because we have our own home grown sex offenders we should also import them in from the middle east as well. Exactly! We have enough crims in this country without importing more, especially misogynist males from male dominated cultures! I don't know exactly what point Farti is trying to make, because we righties are law 'n' order types and come down hard on all crime. He of course is clutching at straws as usual. Look, you might not have even thought about this but ethnics if born here are classed as "Australian." Lebs will always identify as proud "Lions of Lebanon" except when they are charged with crimes. They then become "Australian" for the record books if born here. Police do record the ethnicity and religion of the perpetrators but do not release the info to the public. So, unless the names of those charged are published, we really do not know the ethnicity of the perpetrators. We can assume they are dinki di Aussie criminals, but that is not always the case.
|
|
|
Post by caskur on Mar 3, 2013 12:01:09 GMT 10
While most Sri Lankan's are merely country shoppers and should be deported, given a considerable percentage are deemed non refugee and are deported anyway ...one offender out of thousands isn't bad, ..what is bad is out of fear and loathing branding them all criminals....but that is Rightie logic in it....nothing else to yabber on about other than persecuting asylum seekers....and that is just catering for the low wits in society.. One offender because they were caught early.....doh!!!
|
|
|
Post by caskur on Mar 3, 2013 12:03:15 GMT 10
So, unless the names of those charged are published, we really do not know the ethnicity of the perpetrators. We can assume they are dinki di Aussie criminals, but that is not always the case. Bingo!! that is why you have to follow the conviction trail... that is where their names are reported
|
|
|
Post by slartibartfast on Mar 3, 2013 13:48:37 GMT 10
Exactly! We have enough crims in this country without importing more, especially misogynist males from male dominated cultures! Yup - and we call name one right here!
|
|
|
Post by bender on Mar 3, 2013 18:25:25 GMT 10
While most Sri Lankan's are merely country shoppers and should be deported, given a considerable percentage are deemed non refugee and are deported anyway ...one offender out of thousands isn't bad, ..what is bad is out of fear and loathing branding them all criminals....but that is Rightie logic in it....nothing else to yabber on about other than persecuting asylum seekers....and that is just catering for the low wits in society.. Most Sri lankans are merely country shoppers? How do you justify that belief? Sri lankans fall into two ethnic groups, the majority Sinhalese and the minority Tamil who had been fighting for independance since 1983 and were finally defeated by the Sri lankan Military in 2009. Despite the Australian Government claiming that with the war over Tamil's no longer needed to claim asylum or protection it was revealed that since the end of the war more then 70,000 Tamil civilians have been killed by the Military. It is known that since the Tamil surrender, the Sri lankan Security Forces have embarked on a wide scale operation to apprehend people that were involved in the civil war to ensure that if the Tamil's ever rebel again, they won't have veterans of the first civil war to give them any experience. I can understand why a Government would wish to do that, but it needs to be acknowledged that in doing so, they are continuing offensive military operations that are killing large numbers of civilians. In the last couple of years there has been a noticeable increase in the number of Sinhalese attempting to claim asylum in Australia. Generally, these people are not allowed to lodge a claim and are returned to Sri lanka within days of their arrival on Christmas Island. The cause of this influx was the arrival of people smugglers in Sri lanka (traditionally Tamil groups would organise their own boat and operate it themselves to leave Sri lanka) who were convincing Sinhalese that if they hopped on a boat and went to Australia they'd only spend a few weeks in detention and then would be out and the employment in Australia was so good that they'd earn enough money to be able to live, plus send home about $3,000 a month. Whilst most Tamils do have their claims approved, the Sinhalese are in most cases rejected without being allowed to make a claim because it is difficult if not impossible for them to show how a Sinhalese Majority Government could be oppressing Sinhalese people because of their Sinhalese ethnicity. There are odd cases, mainly involving Sinhalese women who have married a Tamil, and/or their children. To call any of them country shoppers is incorrect in fact. A country shopper is a person who has bypassed or transited a place of safety in order to gain protection in a country they'd prefer to be in. Although there is no rule within the Refugee Convention that states that you must claim asylum at the first place you get to once you leave your homeland the term has gained widespread use. Sri lankans on the whole do not do that. They leave Sri lanka and their very first stop is Australian territory (most of the time the Cocos Islands but occasionally they get all the way to CI), so to describe them on the whole as country shoppers is wrong. The Sinhalese in most instances would be best described as economic refugees. My experience with them is that in most cases they have been working in the Middle East, have returned home to Sri lanka after a decade or more abroad and have found that the economic situation in Sri lanka (due to the cost of expanding the Sri lankan military by 50% to win the war) to be bad. Because they are accustomed to working overseas they've allowed themselves to be conned by the people smugglers (who have targetted them because usually they are cashed up from their work in Saudi or wherever so can afford the ticket for the boatride). You feel sorry for them because they've so obviously been conned, but the fact is that they aren't refugees fleeing persecution and as such have no right to seek, or claim protection from Australia. Tamils on the other hand? It's fairly common for Tamil men to be pulled up by Airport Security when we're moving them about because the sheer amount of shrapnel embedded in their bodies has set off the metal detectors. The number of young men (who couldn't have been more then 13 or so when the war ended) missing a lower leg due to a landmine is shocking and I've heard stories about the conduct of Sri lankan security forces towards Tamils when they carry out sweep operations that should be of great concern to our Government, particularly in light of the fact that we are directing considerable amounts of aid to their military and security forces because of their cooperation in preventing prospective asylum seekers from leaving Sri lanka. On the whole Sri lankans, Sinhalese or Tamil are very polite and compliant in detention and I'd be of the belief that when it comes to actually integrating into Australian society, they would have the greatest success of just about any of the different ethnic groups that arrive on our shores. Unfortunately for the Sinhalese their claims are by and large simply not valid and as such they are returned. As I've already pointed out. Statistically an existing Australian citizen is 45 times more likely to commit an offence then an Asylum Seeker. You can break that down further to those of Anglo Saxon heritage and still state accurately that you are about 30 times more likely to be the victim of a criminal act committed by someone just like Tony Abbot, Scott Morrison or Garfield then you would at the hands of an Asylum Seeker on Community Detention.
|
|
|
Post by caskur on Mar 3, 2013 19:48:57 GMT 10
How many people here think Bender sounds like a boat people smuggler?
|
|
|
Post by slartibartfast on Mar 3, 2013 21:11:37 GMT 10
How many people here think Bender sounds like a boat people smuggler? Just you.
|
|
|
Post by caskur on Mar 3, 2013 23:03:45 GMT 10
How many people here think Bender sounds like a boat people smuggler? Just you. I'm never wrong!
|
|
|
Post by slartibartfast on Mar 3, 2013 23:28:54 GMT 10
Like man on the moon, eh?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 4, 2013 7:33:44 GMT 10
How many people here think Bender sounds like a boat people smuggler? Or a volunteer ... they ship them into Christmas Island on DIAC charter flights. Other than that, he's a hardcore activist and refugee advocate. But he certainly isn't a Serco employee - although it's not too difficult to get a job with them. Virtually anyone could do it ... unskilled workers with no qualification other than a 2 week training course which gives them a Cert 2 in Security.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 4, 2013 7:38:38 GMT 10
Well here's the main problem!! The minority Tamils want independence - and being Hindus they really have this problem with not being the ruling caste. Hindus are like that.
Why should they be granted independence? They are a minority and need to learn how to live peacefully without this constant striving for something that was always going to be unachievable.
|
|
|
Post by sonex on Mar 4, 2013 7:43:52 GMT 10
From Bender's post.
One of the guests on The Insiders pointed this out yesterday, "more politicians have been charged with offences than asylum seekers," He said "would you like to have a politician next door to you".
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 4, 2013 8:11:18 GMT 10
Oh I agree Sonex. Especially those paedophile Labor politicians!!
|
|
|
Post by bender on Mar 4, 2013 13:17:27 GMT 10
Volunteers get shipped in on DIAC Charter Flights?
There is no such thing as a DIAC Charter Flight Stellar. DIAC themselves very rarely go on the Charter. The Charter is run by Serco.
Your assertions here are incredibly enlightening. They show how you will claim something to be God's honest truth when you are 100% wrong. There's no doubt whatsoever in your statement is there. You totally believe it.
Yet you are wrong.
Shouldn't that make you wonder what other of your beliefs are 100% wrong?
|
|
|
Post by bender on Mar 4, 2013 13:23:58 GMT 10
Well here's the main problem!! The minority Tamils want independence - and being Hindus they really have this problem with not being the ruling caste. Hindus are like that. Why should they be granted independence? They are a minority and need to learn how to live peacefully without this constant striving for something that was always going to be unachievable. Stellar the Tamil's gave up on independance and surrendered back in 2009 (which followed the Sri lankan Military restarting offensive operations after a ceasefire that lasted from 2002 to 2006). Your grasp of history is almost as bad as your hold on reality.
|
|
|
Post by garfield on Mar 4, 2013 13:30:08 GMT 10
Bender, the Tamils have opened up a new front ... at Sydney university ;D
|
|
|
Post by bender on Mar 4, 2013 13:54:48 GMT 10
Garfield, one Sri lankan Asylum Seeker has been charged with an offence (indecent assault). He was not living at the University, he was living in other accomodation, had allegedly visited friends who were staying at the Campus, and subsequently this incident has happened.
How do you think the police picked him up so fast? Do you think one of the other Sri lankan's there might have turned him in.
You're a white male. You are the number 1 candidate for any sort of sexual assault in Australia (ethnically speaking). You're the number 1 candidate for sexually abusing children, you're the number 1 candidate for sexually abusing your own children, you're the number 1 candidate for sexually assaulting a former partner, a current partner, a workmate, a casual friend, someone you met online, a girl you took out on a date, someone who found themselves in a position where you could act on your predatory instincts.
Ethnically speaking of course. You haven't done those things. A white male has, and is statistically far more likely to do those things then any other ethnic group.
So do you think it's fair if I use the term "Garfield the child rapist" in every post to refer to you? Do you believe that because a white male has done those things you should bare some sort of blood guilt for it? A person has allegedly committed an act. The police very quickly located and charged a person who is currently in remand awaiting a committal hearing.
I believe rape or sexual assault to be one of the very worst crimes imaginable. For a person to be so totally robbed of their dignity, to be used by another person. To me, it ranks not far beneath murder in its impact upon a person. And I believe those who have committed such a crime to be so far outside the bounds of normal human behaviour that the potential sanction for such a crime should be life imprisonment, particularly for attacks which involve serious physical assault as a component.
Which is why I get a little annoyed when I see dickheads like you using it as a casual slur to aid in your idiotic tirades against Asylum Seekers.
|
|